Sustainable LEGO® Elements: 40320 Plants from Plants [Guest Article]

At The Brothers Brick, we tend to specialize in certain kinds of news, LEGO creations, and reviews, but thanks to our partnerships with other LEGO websites, we’re able to bring you more kinds of content. Please enjoy this excellent article that originally appeared on New Elementary.

Here at New Elementary we usually talk about new shapes and colours of LEGO® elements but today we’re looking at a new material from which some botanical elements are now being made. By 2030, The LEGO Group (TLG) intend to use sustainable materials in all of their core products and packaging.

This article is a collaboration between Are J. Heiseldal who met TLG employees Matt Whitby (Environmental Responsibility Engagement) and Bistra Andersen (Senior Materials Platform Manager) at LEGO Fan Media Days in Billund, Tim Johnson, and Elspeth De Montes who has her hands on the limited edition gift-with-purchase set, 40320 Plants from Plants. Thanks also to Francesco Spreafico for additional pictures.

The first bricks made in 1949 were made from cellulose acetate, which warps over time. After some research by plastics companies, TLG replaced it in 1963 with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, used to this day.

Currently, LEGO elements are primarily made from four different materials:

  1. acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) which is used to make the majority of LEGO elements, most notably bricks and plates.
  2. polycarbonate (PC) is primarily used to make transparent parts, as ABS is opaque, however because it is stronger than ABS it is sometimes employed for parts that require additional strength such as the ‘Mixel joints’.
  3. styrene butadiene styrene (SBS) which is used to make the more elastic elements like tyres.
  4. polyethene is used to make the softer, flexible elements such as plants, some hairpieces and dragon wings.

Prototypes of Design ID 14419, moulded in a variety of plastics. PC was used in the end.

However, there are an additional dozen or so plastics that are used across the many thousands of elements currently in production.

Sustainability and its challenges

Changing the materials and the moulds that LEGO elements are made from is very difficult but TLG sure have a worthy goal:

“We want to make a positive impact on the world our children will inherit.”

75 billion LEGO elements are sold every year and TLG will not compromise on quality, safety or durability – plus they want sustainability of colours too. The LEGO Group 2030 Sustainable Materials Challenge started in 2015, and is a greater challenge than you might have initially imagined.

It’s important to clarify that sustainable does not mean biodegradable, because biodegradable plastic is not necessarily good for the environment as the plastic will just break down into chunks, then into smaller and smaller pieces. This causes many environmental issues, such as the tiny threads or beads of plastic that have already been proven in many studies to be present in the foods we buy and consume.

So the first question is, what is a sustainable material? “For The LEGO Group, a sustainable material is one that meets our high quality and safety standards, has key environmental and social sustainability attributes and maximises the play value of our products.” The goal is that all LEGO elements should be made from materials that are either recycled or plant based. Ideally they’d like the new bricks to contain at least 25% bio-content.

They also want to avoid having to trust only one supplier, so they don’t become dependent. And they’re considering cooperating with other industries, like the automotive and furniture industries, which might use similar types of plastics in their products. But they’d never cooperate with a direct competitor.

And just to complicate matters further: “Toy safety standards in Europe are the same as food safety standards. Because children put toys in their mouths.” Well, now that they’re making LEGO elements from sugarcane, aren’t you tempted to try that too?

Bye bye ABS

“Our biggest challenge is the LEGO brick, i.e. replacing ABS.”

No doubt this is of the greatest importance to AFOLs too, yet LEGO bricks have more material properties than you may realise. And remember, TLG has been learning how best to work with ABS since 1963; that’s 55 years of technical experience that needs to be applied to a completely new material. They have a lot of factors to consider and balance; here are some of the more important ones:

Look and feel

  • Opacity – how ‘transparent’ the elements are, although we mean solid colours here rather than transparent ones. A good example is Dark Red from the 2000s vs. ‘New’ Dark Red from the 2010s, which is slightly more opaque.
  • Decoration – how does the material react to the chemicals used in the inks? Will new inks also need to be found?
  • Touch – we are all subconsciously aware of what a LEGO brick feels like and may well notice if some parts begin to feel slightly harder or softer, or lighter or heavier. And of course, some parts are already made from different plastics which have different feels too.
  • Sound – ah, the beautiful rattle of LEGO bricks being shaken in a box, or tipped into a pile. But that sound changes when different materials are used. Will consumers notice, and will they care?


  • Knobs – we all know of the famous ‘clutch power’ between LEGO bricks; not too weak and not too strong.
  • Shafts – the friction properties between elements is another essential consideration. Try putting a transparent bar into a transparent cone and then pull it out again. (Warning: don’t do this if you actually want to ever use those parts separately again.)
  • Snaps – the power of clips also needs careful fine-tuning. The number of times that some parts with clips have been redesigned over the years is a testament to this!


  • Structural – the material needs to work with parts of all sizes; you can imagine how different the issues with moulding a 16×16 plate might be, compared to a 1×1 plate.
  • Moulding – there is a swathe of technical issues when creating LEGO elements and changing the fundamental material they are made from creates a plethora of engineering concerns.

Are you now getting a sense of just how difficult it is to replace the humble LEGO brick?

Implements used by LEGO parts engineers to test clutch. The brick here is regular ABS

Many candidate materials have been tried and discarded or sent back to the drawing board, for varying reasons.

These green bricks derived from wheat ticked many of the boxes, but as you can see the colour is slightly marbled which of course is unacceptable. They also feel and sound much more brittle than current bricks, even though they aren’t.

When making transparent bricks, their biggest challenge is too much friction. Currently, they’re considering a material made from wood pulp. The wood would then, of course, be sourced sustainably.

Other bricks have been moulded from a polymer based on corn, and the DUPLO bricks seen here are made from algae. (Apologies for the blurry pic!) The corn bricks (not pictured) are about as close as they have got at the moment to replicating the current LEGO brick. They still aren’t completely happy, so will keep researching. The main challenge is that the bricks are still just a little bit too brittle; their breaking point is lower than current ABS bricks.

Plants from Plants

As mentioned, plant pieces are currently made from polyethene. In 2018 TLG introduced plant pieces made from a new polyethene which uses ethanol produced from sugarcane rather than petroleum, thus making it a sustainable source – while still being chemically identical.

Choosing plants and not regular bricks to be the first sustainable elements was a conscious choice. Aside from the nice PR perspective of them being ‘plants from plants’, they are an easier plastic to replace as their feel is not as iconic.

TLG is nevertheless facing criticism for using sugarcane, from people who are claiming that they are clearing rainforest in the process. TLG say this is not true, pointing out this would be a minute part of the total global impact and they are working with WWF to source the sugarcane sustainably. Replacing trees is also a much faster process than replacing oil.

But TLG also says there are better prospects than sugarcane such as corn because these are made from the non-edible parts of the plant. Sugarcane elements are made from an edible source, which could alternatively be used for food.

TLG does not distinguish between the new plant parts that are made from plants and the old plant parts, which aren’t. They’ll just be phased in gradually. However, to celebrate their introduction, they are releasing a limited edition gift-with-purchase in August containing the new sustainable LEGO elements: 40320 Plants from Plants. Let’s take a closer look.

Inside the Box

40302 contains two plastic bags with a total of 29 elements inside. None of these is new, aside from the material of course.

The first bag contains:

  • 16 Dark Green [TLG] / Green [BL]  BAMBOO LEAVES 3X3 (Element ID 4114348 | Design ID 30176)
  • four Bright Yellowish Green [TLG] / Lime [BL]  Limb Element, Small (Element ID 6094069 | Design ID 2423)

The second bag contains:

  • three Dark Green [TLG] / Green [BL] Bush  (Element ID 6055785 | Design ID 6064)
  • two Dark Green [TLG] / Green [BL] Spruce Tree, small (Element ID 243528 | Design ID 2435)
  • four Dark Green [TLG] / Green [BL]  Palm leaf, Small (Element ID 6074322 | Design ID 6148)

There is also a leaflet inside the box which has a brief mission statement about the Plants from Plants initiative, in English, Spanish, French and German.

It also states, “The classic botanical LEGO elements are available for the first time in brilliant lime green colour” but the only such element in the set is Limb Element, Small which has appeared in this colour in no less than 19 different sets between 2015 – 2018, so we’re a little confused about that  statement. It is also amusing that TLG used the colloquial name by describing the colour as lime green rather than their own name, Bright Yellowish Green, but that’s understandable!

Comparing the old and new

Can you tell the Plants from Plants elements from ones made from petroleum-based polyethene?
Take a closer look…

To be honest that was a bit of a trick question because as we’ve already explained, there is no chemical difference between plant-based polyethene and petroleum-based polyethene. For those who wondered, the ‘plants from plants’ elements were all shown to the right.

So, as LEGO Tim shows below, we can all rest assured that our favourite plants look the same, feel the same, smell the same…

…and (sadly) taste the same, despite being made from sugarcane!

It’s a good time to recognise TLG’s first steps towards sustainable materials, albeit currently in a small proportion of their overall plastic product. Of course, LEGO bricks are already entirely recyclable, as they retain their play value whether you pass them on to your children, sell them on or give them away to charity – this is the beauty of LEGO bricks; they still all fit decades later.


8 comments on “Sustainable LEGO® Elements: 40320 Plants from Plants [Guest Article]

  1. Michael Emminger

    I’ve seen this coming down the pipe with dread for over a decade. Early bio plastics were nightmarish. I’m pleased with the progress LEGO has made and I’m likely to buy a bit of extra LEGO this month to try out the new plant plants.

  2. Purple Dave

    I’m trying to remember a single minifig hair element that was made of polyethylene. Trying, and failing. I know of several that are made of rubber (SBS, which still sounds offensively redundant to my ears), and tons that are made of ABS (CA was, I believe, phased out before they even introduced any of the precursors to the minifig, such as the plank minifigs and the Homemaker maxifigs). I was thinking maybe B.A.’s mohawk, but that feels too stiff to be anything but ABS. Currently the best (only) option I can come up with might be 85945, the Space Police III Skull Twins helmet. Problem is, it feels too rubbery to be PE, and too stiff to be SBS, so I really can’t tell one way or the other.

    Minifig _heads_ on the other hand, I know for sure exist in PE, because the Toy Story Claw Alien wouldn’t pass safety standards in ABS and it’s clearly not rubber.

  3. Johnson Rod

    Instead of making inferior Legos from GMO petrochemical monocrop agriculture with huge subsidies, could Lego just make the papal indulgences direct to Monsanto and the Gaia cult and leave us innocent fun loving kids out of it?

  4. E De Montes

    @Johnson Rod. You seem to not understand the chemical nature of the new LEGO elements. You write “inferior Legos (sic)” but they are EXACTLY the same chemically and are not in any way inferior, you can stay a happy fun loving kid after all.

  5. Johnson Rod

    @E De Montes, read the article past the headline before you comment. This is about Lego’s plans for the future.

    I’m illuminating the cozy relationship between environmentalism and industry. Nothing in the works is about making Legos better for us. Everything is about making them close enough to pass off without us noticing. Gee, thanks? That’s the redesign nobody asked for. Corporate marketing is always the same. Instead of making a better product, they make a worse product and try to rebrand it as being better. But the joke’s on you when you make the uncomfortable realization your new buddy is Monsanto: destroyer of all humanity. I’m not surprised you took a condescending passive aggressive tone with me. Nobody likes the messenger. Although I was surprised how much you sounded like a sales pitch.

    But since Legos are made in China now and contaminated with lead, who cares anyway?

  6. Purple Dave

    @the dude with the unimaginatively phallic username:

    She helped _write_ the article when it was originally published at New Elementary. Maybe read the byline next time.

    They’ve been working on replacing ABS for three years now and haven’t come up with anything worth announcing. Plant-based plants was the proverbial low-hanging fruit. Ethyl alcohol has a very specific molecular formula, so whether you make it from Sweet Texas Crude or plants growing in your backyard, it’s chemically indistinguishable if you ignore any trace contaminants. Polyethylene (aka polyethene, aka polythene, aka some woman named Pam that the Beatles knew) is made from ethyl alcohol, and since the main ingredient is chemically identical, the end result will not be any different as a result of switching to plant-based sources. It’s like how a dollar is a dollar, whether you mowed your neighbor’s lawn to get it, or found it on the sidewalk. Regardless of the source, it still spends the same.

    Yeah, that’s not going to help. I own exactly three Friends sets (friends don’t let friends play Friends). Two are identical copies of Stephanie’s Cool Convertible, which I bought for the medium-blue fenders (yup, I wrote that exactly as intended), and the third is a copy of I think Olivia’s House that I won as a door prize at one of the Brickworld Expos I’ve displayed at. Still haven’t opened it because there still hasn’t been anything I needed so desperately to do so, and the part list doesn’t really look like I’d take more than about $5 worth of stuff out of it before I exhausted what I’d be likely to use someday. So, maybe point out some specific hairstyles for me? One of our members does have a wife who exclusively displays Friends models, so if I know what to look for I can maybe try to check them out. If she’s not displaying at the show we set up for in a couple days, she certainly plans to do so at the next Brickworld Expo in about a month.

Comments are closed.