Comments on: Skull Fighter

By: oneman

oneman — Fri, 27 Jul 2012 20:42:35 +0000

^ O! You’ve changed the photo…Thanks :)

By: Tromas

Tromas — Fri, 27 Jul 2012 18:22:10 +0000

No worries Bartosz!

I am not sure why there would have been a difference in the photo quality. I did just edit the post with a slightly smaller copy of the photo, but not sure if that really made any difference or not?

By: oneman

oneman — Fri, 27 Jul 2012 18:14:09 +0000

> Guys >
I have no idea why the photo, which is not so grainy in the original (even in bigger size – on Flickr -> see:http://www.flickr.com/photos/29418589@N06/7652002366/sizes/l/) is grainy here (?)
anyway glad you like my MOC.
> .Tromas > Thank you for the very nice description ^.

By: Tromas

Tromas — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 20:21:23 +0000

@ Deus – You are right that picture quality helps. It certainly makes a LEGO model initially look more eye-catching. That being said, the quality of the model is far more important in my eyes. Could this photo, and Flak_Magnet’s photo of the Mini be higher quality??…sure, but the fact is, both images do still clearly show the models. Both are on neutral background and both are in focus. I am certainly not going to hold out on posting a fantastic model just because it isn’t professionally photoshopped.

And in Bartosz’s case, if anything I think the graininess of the photo adds to it (considering the subject matter).

By: Deus

Deus — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 20:07:56 +0000

This is an amazing creation, but I thought the picture quality had to be on a certain level, meeting a requirement that does not seem to be filled in this case. Or my eyesight got worse on this and the last other blog posts, but only on photographs.