Comments on: New LEGO Architecture Set: 21013 Big Ben [News]

By: smackfu

smackfu — Mon, 14 May 2012 18:39:08 +0000

I’m a bit disappointed… I would have preferred a Houses of Parliament set that included Big Ben, or a super detailed Big Ben tower. Doing a mini scale of just the tower seems like a half solution.

Here’s the official page:
http://architecture.lego.com/en-us/products/landmark/big-ben-21013/

By: Jean C

Jean C — Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:43:40 +0000

I think you’re being a little unfair, SirMo. It may not be the most adventurous set ever, but that’s not what the architecture sets are about. They’re about capturing the essence of a building in as few as possible bricks… (and, to be cynical, then charging far more than the bricks are worth).

By: Chris

Chris — Sun, 22 Apr 2012 06:02:38 +0000

Thanks for pointing it out, vdubguy67. :)

By: vdubguy67'

vdubguy67' — Sun, 22 Apr 2012 05:15:44 +0000

^^ Just trying to help anyone from getting into trouble that’s all. You’re welcome.

By: SirMo

SirMo — Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:54:07 +0000

Afraid to say that’s the laziest lego set I’ve ever seen. A brick on a keyring took more effort

By: Andrew

Andrew — Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:22:56 +0000

^ We used the photo that LEGO provided us; they gave us the wrong photo, which they’ve since corrected. What are you implying by “I don’t know if [TBB] cares”?

By: vdubguy67'

vdubguy67' — Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:33:13 +0000

I don’t know if the “Brothers-Brick” staff cares about this, but I thought I would point out that the big Ben photo still has the “Confidential” watermark on it. Althought it is very faint, I still thought it would be appropriate to bring it to you attention.