<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10225 UCS R2-D2 &#8211; new LEGO Star Wars exclusive [News]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brothers-brick.com/2012/03/16/10225-ucs-r2d2-new-lego-star-wars-exclusive-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2012/03/16/10225-ucs-r2d2-new-lego-star-wars-exclusive-news/</link>
	<description>And one Brick to rule them all...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:03:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: woogychuck</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2012/03/16/10225-ucs-r2d2-new-lego-star-wars-exclusive-news/comment-page-1/#comment-91291</link>
		<dc:creator>woogychuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=25022#comment-91291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really want to like this set, but I just don&#039;t. The curves are blocky, the little saw and arm attachments look tacked on, no wheels, and it just looks a bit bland overall.

I appreciate that they&#039;re trying to keep more UCS sets coming, and they&#039;re running out of ideas, but this just looks unfinished to me. I would much rather see them tackle some ships they haven&#039;t done yet (like an A-Wing or B-Wing), do something from the prequels, or possibly come out with a new version of the some of the earlier UCS sets like the TIE Interceptor or X-Wing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really want to like this set, but I just don&#8217;t. The curves are blocky, the little saw and arm attachments look tacked on, no wheels, and it just looks a bit bland overall.</p>
<p>I appreciate that they&#8217;re trying to keep more UCS sets coming, and they&#8217;re running out of ideas, but this just looks unfinished to me. I would much rather see them tackle some ships they haven&#8217;t done yet (like an A-Wing or B-Wing), do something from the prequels, or possibly come out with a new version of the some of the earlier UCS sets like the TIE Interceptor or X-Wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virtualsweden</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2012/03/16/10225-ucs-r2d2-new-lego-star-wars-exclusive-news/comment-page-1/#comment-91267</link>
		<dc:creator>virtualsweden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 07:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=25022#comment-91267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parental leave, fantastic LEGO that this comes through in the message. Its seldom you hear companies presenting products mention this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parental leave, fantastic LEGO that this comes through in the message. Its seldom you hear companies presenting products mention this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legomunchinashton</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2012/03/16/10225-ucs-r2d2-new-lego-star-wars-exclusive-news/comment-page-1/#comment-91262</link>
		<dc:creator>legomunchinashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 23:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=25022#comment-91262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it&#039;s funky look&#039;in dude dude dude dude]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s funky look&#8217;in dude dude dude dude</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legomunchinashton</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2012/03/16/10225-ucs-r2d2-new-lego-star-wars-exclusive-news/comment-page-1/#comment-91261</link>
		<dc:creator>legomunchinashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 23:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=25022#comment-91261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[put noise in it.Seriosly it&#039;s soooooooooooooo b-o-r-i-n-g without it, like  put some effort in&#039;to it so it will be more interesting.it&#039;s junk like that.wll you please?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>put noise in it.Seriosly it&#8217;s soooooooooooooo b-o-r-i-n-g without it, like  put some effort in&#8217;to it so it will be more interesting.it&#8217;s junk like that.wll you please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean C</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2012/03/16/10225-ucs-r2d2-new-lego-star-wars-exclusive-news/comment-page-1/#comment-91255</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 08:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=25022#comment-91255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This looks great - I like the brick and plate dome particularly, a purpose built piece might have looked *better*, but this keeps the &#039;legoish&#039; feel while still leaving no doubt as to what it is.

A &#039;must have&#039;, I think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks great &#8211; I like the brick and plate dome particularly, a purpose built piece might have looked *better*, but this keeps the &#8216;legoish&#8217; feel while still leaving no doubt as to what it is.</p>
<p>A &#8216;must have&#8217;, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rushiosan</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2012/03/16/10225-ucs-r2d2-new-lego-star-wars-exclusive-news/comment-page-1/#comment-91253</link>
		<dc:creator>rushiosan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 06:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=25022#comment-91253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was expecting a sound effect function or something... I mean c&#039;mon, they did this to less relevant sets with &quot;sound bricks&quot; years ago (i.e. Insectoids), why not make a more functional, cheaper R2 this time? This function seems to be completely optional in my opinion, if you just don&#039;t want it to have noise, take the batteries off... different from the Mindstorms Droid Kit, where the power functions were the main point of the set.

To be honest, I don&#039;t like the bricky shape of his head. The body is very well designed, with slope bricks, circuit details and such, but why not put some effort on the head using curved bricks? Or even a new dome piece, similar to that one from Mindstorms SW droid kit? Somehow, that head seems out of place...

Anyway, this thing is definitely a must-have on my shelf!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was expecting a sound effect function or something&#8230; I mean c&#8217;mon, they did this to less relevant sets with &#8220;sound bricks&#8221; years ago (i.e. Insectoids), why not make a more functional, cheaper R2 this time? This function seems to be completely optional in my opinion, if you just don&#8217;t want it to have noise, take the batteries off&#8230; different from the Mindstorms Droid Kit, where the power functions were the main point of the set.</p>
<p>To be honest, I don&#8217;t like the bricky shape of his head. The body is very well designed, with slope bricks, circuit details and such, but why not put some effort on the head using curved bricks? Or even a new dome piece, similar to that one from Mindstorms SW droid kit? Somehow, that head seems out of place&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, this thing is definitely a must-have on my shelf!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laytoncy</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2012/03/16/10225-ucs-r2d2-new-lego-star-wars-exclusive-news/comment-page-1/#comment-91250</link>
		<dc:creator>laytoncy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=25022#comment-91250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is wonderful.  Of course, I was hoping it be motorized as well.  But hey one can dream.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is wonderful.  Of course, I was hoping it be motorized as well.  But hey one can dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
