<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Train double feature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brothers-brick.com/2011/10/13/train-double-feature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2011/10/13/train-double-feature/</link>
	<description>And one Brick to rule them all...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:14:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wunztwice</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2011/10/13/train-double-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-90163</link>
		<dc:creator>wunztwice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 01:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=22786#comment-90163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[^
Sounds like an idea for Mr. Big Ben...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^<br />
Sounds like an idea for Mr. Big Ben&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gambort</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2011/10/13/train-double-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-90162</link>
		<dc:creator>gambort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=22786#comment-90162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[^ I agree with this although I think it&#039;s by far the best compromise between looks and working. The studless technic is a bit fat. However to do proper running gear that both works and looks good is very, very difficult. You&#039;re really pushing up against the limits of what you can do in pure LEGO. I&#039;m unaware of a better solution in general cases.

There are better (IMO) solutions using the old flex system but getting the parts is very difficult and expensive and may not always be appropriate. Personally I&#039;ve been working for ages on using bars and clips but my solutions will all have issues with running for long periods.

I suspect the ultimate solution would be a custom rod system with specially moulded parts. But I won&#039;t hold my breath for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ I agree with this although I think it&#8217;s by far the best compromise between looks and working. The studless technic is a bit fat. However to do proper running gear that both works and looks good is very, very difficult. You&#8217;re really pushing up against the limits of what you can do in pure LEGO. I&#8217;m unaware of a better solution in general cases.</p>
<p>There are better (IMO) solutions using the old flex system but getting the parts is very difficult and expensive and may not always be appropriate. Personally I&#8217;ve been working for ages on using bars and clips but my solutions will all have issues with running for long periods.</p>
<p>I suspect the ultimate solution would be a custom rod system with specially moulded parts. But I won&#8217;t hold my breath for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean C</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2011/10/13/train-double-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-90158</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=22786#comment-90158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great pics, and great models too. 

The only thing that detracts from these locos - and many/most other lego steam locos - is the studless technic beam as a connecting rod (I think that&#039;s the term) attached to the drivers. I understand that it&#039;s functional, but it doesn&#039;t look good. Surely someone must be able to think of a better solution (and no, I can&#039;t).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great pics, and great models too. </p>
<p>The only thing that detracts from these locos &#8211; and many/most other lego steam locos &#8211; is the studless technic beam as a connecting rod (I think that&#8217;s the term) attached to the drivers. I understand that it&#8217;s functional, but it doesn&#8217;t look good. Surely someone must be able to think of a better solution (and no, I can&#8217;t).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wunztwice</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2011/10/13/train-double-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-90141</link>
		<dc:creator>wunztwice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=22786#comment-90141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really great MOCs here, but considering they are trains you should have titled the post &quot;Train Double Header.&quot;  

; )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really great MOCs here, but considering they are trains you should have titled the post &#8220;Train Double Header.&#8221;  </p>
<p>; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
