<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M3 Half-track APC, M4 Sherman tank, &amp; Dodge WC54 ambulance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brothers-brick.com/2010/07/24/my-m3-half-track-apc-m4-sherman-tank-dodge-wc54-ambulance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2010/07/24/my-m3-half-track-apc-m4-sherman-tank-dodge-wc54-ambulance/</link>
	<description>And one Brick to rule them all...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:32:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaxFragg</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2010/07/24/my-m3-half-track-apc-m4-sherman-tank-dodge-wc54-ambulance/comment-page-1/#comment-87352</link>
		<dc:creator>MaxFragg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=16360#comment-87352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i actually really like your halftrack, the sherman is a bit out of shape, i think Daniel Siskinds is still the king in terms of shermans ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i actually really like your halftrack, the sherman is a bit out of shape, i think Daniel Siskinds is still the king in terms of shermans ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the enigma that is badger</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2010/07/24/my-m3-half-track-apc-m4-sherman-tank-dodge-wc54-ambulance/comment-page-1/#comment-87314</link>
		<dc:creator>the enigma that is badger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 15:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=16360#comment-87314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Now to build some sort of massive World War II diorama to put these in…&quot;

They&#039;d be perfect for the second year of the Operation: Bricklord display!

http://sites.google.com/site/bricklordproject/

http://forums.brickarms.com/yaf_topics273_Operation-Bricklord-2010.aspx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Now to build some sort of massive World War II diorama to put these in…&#8221;</p>
<p>They&#8217;d be perfect for the second year of the Operation: Bricklord display!</p>
<p><a href="http://sites.google.com/site/bricklordproject/" rel="nofollow">http://sites.google.com/site/bricklordproject/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://forums.brickarms.com/yaf_topics273_Operation-Bricklord-2010.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://forums.brickarms.com/yaf_topics273_Operation-Bricklord-2010.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mad Physicist</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2010/07/24/my-m3-half-track-apc-m4-sherman-tank-dodge-wc54-ambulance/comment-page-1/#comment-87311</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mad Physicist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 07:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=16360#comment-87311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As far as I am concerned, model building is where most of the technical challenges are to be found. I completely agree with your observation that many LEGO vehicles are too tall or too wide, at least compared to figures standing next to them. I like the half track in particular.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I am concerned, model building is where most of the technical challenges are to be found. I completely agree with your observation that many LEGO vehicles are too tall or too wide, at least compared to figures standing next to them. I like the half track in particular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2010/07/24/my-m3-half-track-apc-m4-sherman-tank-dodge-wc54-ambulance/comment-page-1/#comment-87310</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 02:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=16360#comment-87310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suspension is definitely something I&#039;m weak on. Thanks for the pointer! :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suspension is definitely something I&#8217;m weak on. Thanks for the pointer! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno Vaiano</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2010/07/24/my-m3-half-track-apc-m4-sherman-tank-dodge-wc54-ambulance/comment-page-1/#comment-87309</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno Vaiano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 01:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=16360#comment-87309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow Andrew, I guess that you impress us all by going Military way, but you´re doing a very good here. The Dodge and the Sherman are really nice, but the M3 doesn´t quite have the feel of the real life counterpart, in my opinion. I know I may sound a little self promoting here, but couldn´t you pick a coulple of ideas in mine M3? 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/37598529@N02/4226137876/in/set-72157624318660049/
I guess that its suspention would look quite nice there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Andrew, I guess that you impress us all by going Military way, but you´re doing a very good here. The Dodge and the Sherman are really nice, but the M3 doesn´t quite have the feel of the real life counterpart, in my opinion. I know I may sound a little self promoting here, but couldn´t you pick a coulple of ideas in mine M3?<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/37598529@N02/4226137876/in/set-72157624318660049/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/37598529@N02/4226137876/in/set-72157624318660049/</a><br />
I guess that its suspention would look quite nice there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
