<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Upcoming 8259 Mini Dozer + animated instructions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brothers-brick.com/2008/10/27/upcoming-8259-mini-dozer-animated-instructions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2008/10/27/upcoming-8259-mini-dozer-animated-instructions/</link>
	<description>Home of the LEGO Debate Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:54:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alexandre Campos</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2008/10/27/upcoming-8259-mini-dozer-animated-instructions/comment-page-1/#comment-56395</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandre Campos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=3629#comment-56395</guid>
		<description>Wow, I never thought the fact that I put the construction steps in an animated GIF would cause so much amazement! First I&#039;m told Klocki mentioned the animation, now TBB...

Actually, Tim, making the actual LDraw file, before sorting out its parts into construction steps, was the biggest work (so much that people pointed out errors with it twice). Re-arranging the parts into construction steps was a long session of drag-and-dropping, but, apart from making sure parts were only added in front of others, wasn&#039;t much difficult or required much planning.

What amazes me the most is all the aura this little set has generated: two people already independently reverse-engineered the 8259 before me, one of them even with motorisation! Their creations can be seen at &lt;a href=&quot;http://technicbricks.blogspot.com/2008/10/8259-dozer-mania.html&quot; rel=&quot;&quot;&gt;TechnicBRICKs&lt;/a&gt;.
I don&#039;t think any other set got such enthusiasm, I&#039;m not sure why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I never thought the fact that I put the construction steps in an animated GIF would cause so much amazement! First I&#8217;m told Klocki mentioned the animation, now TBB&#8230;</p>
<p>Actually, Tim, making the actual LDraw file, before sorting out its parts into construction steps, was the biggest work (so much that people pointed out errors with it twice). Re-arranging the parts into construction steps was a long session of drag-and-dropping, but, apart from making sure parts were only added in front of others, wasn&#8217;t much difficult or required much planning.</p>
<p>What amazes me the most is all the aura this little set has generated: two people already independently reverse-engineered the 8259 before me, one of them even with motorisation! Their creations can be seen at <a href="http://technicbricks.blogspot.com/2008/10/8259-dozer-mania.html" rel="">TechnicBRICKs</a>.<br />
I don&#8217;t think any other set got such enthusiasm, I&#8217;m not sure why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim David</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2008/10/27/upcoming-8259-mini-dozer-animated-instructions/comment-page-1/#comment-56338</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=3629#comment-56338</guid>
		<description>That animation seems simple but it must have taken a fair bit of planning to to  work out the order of the part to be both buildable and clear from the single veiwpoint</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That animation seems simple but it must have taken a fair bit of planning to to  work out the order of the part to be both buildable and clear from the single veiwpoint</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
