<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lego is communication: summing up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brothers-brick.com/2008/06/09/lego-is-communication-summing-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2008/06/09/lego-is-communication-summing-up/</link>
	<description>And one Brick to rule them all...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:32:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gambort</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2008/06/09/lego-is-communication-summing-up/comment-page-1/#comment-40289</link>
		<dc:creator>Gambort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 06:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=2399#comment-40289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevoh&gt; Problem is that that&#039;s a lot of work for any given MOC post. Perhaps the occasional analysis would be good but I don&#039;t know how many of us really have the tools or vocabulary to do it justice. I know I don&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevoh> Problem is that that&#8217;s a lot of work for any given MOC post. Perhaps the occasional analysis would be good but I don&#8217;t know how many of us really have the tools or vocabulary to do it justice. I know I don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevoh</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2008/06/09/lego-is-communication-summing-up/comment-page-1/#comment-40274</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 02:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=2399#comment-40274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would be very interested in posts that aren&#039;t just &quot;hey look at this cool moc by nnenn/legohaulic/moko/olog&quot;

Instead, how about some meaningful commentary/criticism, or insight into the builder or his process, or how the latest creation compares to his/her previous work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be very interested in posts that aren&#8217;t just &#8220;hey look at this cool moc by nnenn/legohaulic/moko/olog&#8221;</p>
<p>Instead, how about some meaningful commentary/criticism, or insight into the builder or his process, or how the latest creation compares to his/her previous work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Lindemood</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2008/06/09/lego-is-communication-summing-up/comment-page-1/#comment-40273</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Lindemood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 02:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=2399#comment-40273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, I really like this sort of &quot;talk&quot; format once in a while on the Brothers Brick.  Keep it going, but don&#039;t forget the heart of what makes me keep coming back to this blog for rest from more wordy websites: the featured MOCs presented as such visual candy.  I think this series kept a nice balance.  Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I really like this sort of &#8220;talk&#8221; format once in a while on the Brothers Brick.  Keep it going, but don&#8217;t forget the heart of what makes me keep coming back to this blog for rest from more wordy websites: the featured MOCs presented as such visual candy.  I think this series kept a nice balance.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Memory</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2008/06/09/lego-is-communication-summing-up/comment-page-1/#comment-40267</link>
		<dc:creator>Memory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=2399#comment-40267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks a lot, Linus. Although I&#039;ve only commented a couple of times, I&#039;ve definitely learned something from this series (mostly about how a model can be a message). It would be cool if you did a case study now and then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot, Linus. Although I&#8217;ve only commented a couple of times, I&#8217;ve definitely learned something from this series (mostly about how a model can be a message). It would be cool if you did a case study now and then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garth Danielson</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2008/06/09/lego-is-communication-summing-up/comment-page-1/#comment-40266</link>
		<dc:creator>Garth Danielson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 23:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=2399#comment-40266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been enjoyin&#039; this series of articles and would like to see more discussion like this. I prefer this sort of discussion in article format, especially if I&#039;m not writing it, as opposed to a forum where people tend to fire off short talking points or turn to yelling and name calling. Serious or at least semi-serious discussion is great, there are always people who like that sort of thing. Me 1. 

I like to see them articles on websites, where there is a lower cost of production and distribution, plus for me, the added bonus of instant two way communication. Can you hear me now? I don&#039;t think you&#039;d have the impact on paper with a two or three month gap in between parts. 

In my mind I don&#039;t feel that building a LEGO MOC is any different than building any sort of art, and there are plenty of books full of rules and presentation techiques to make things more pleasing or to create the opposite effect. Mosaics are drawings or paintings and vigs are dioramas or statues. People who aren&#039;t into LEGO understand the correlation. Just saying &quot;I like to build statues and not have to paint them&quot; breaks down all sorts of barriers in communication. But even with all that knowledge behind me, I try to break some conventions when I can. It&#039;s not always successful but shape and color have nearly endless combinations, why not try as many as you can. 

I don&#039;t see anything wrong with raising the bar for the hobby, as well as tossin&#039; in a little fun discussion. It&#039;s all great. More building tips can only be a big help to the person starting out, like me. I know I suck at robot building and I&#039;m an infant when it comes to Technics. I used to throw them in a box and hide that box. Now I have to go on Bricklink to look up some of those parts to even understand what they are. Oh, it does that. Well, I&#039;m using it for a downspout. 

Ted brings up a good point about not trying to convince people that their hobby is worth while. Either people can see the value of the message or they can&#039;t. Time solves many problems. Model Railroading has been around for at least a century, (I&#039;m guessin&#039; here but don&#039;t think I&#039;m too far off) and people know about it because it&#039;s been around so long. It&#039;s become part of the public conciousness, and people know it&#039;s not too dangerous. Just the expensiveness of it creates a sort of respectability. I alway tell people that LEGO is really expensive. 

I joined Science Fiction fandom in 1970 when it was a spurned reading matter. &quot;You read science fiction? Ohhh.&quot; Yeah, at least three h&#039;s. But, since Star Trek and Star Wars everybody and his brother is a science fiction fan. LEGO is a toddler on that scale, especially if you are just looking at the AFOL community. Have people had weird or negative experiences when they reveal their secret identity. Mostly I have had really great reactions from people when I tell them my hobby is building with LEGO. Especially when I show them something. Actually, I bring things to work and force people to look at them. &quot;I am not goin&#039; away.&quot; Since I mostly make MOC&#039;s with a bit of a fun message I think they get recieved fairly well. And that really gets back to the message and how readable that message is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been enjoyin&#8217; this series of articles and would like to see more discussion like this. I prefer this sort of discussion in article format, especially if I&#8217;m not writing it, as opposed to a forum where people tend to fire off short talking points or turn to yelling and name calling. Serious or at least semi-serious discussion is great, there are always people who like that sort of thing. Me 1. </p>
<p>I like to see them articles on websites, where there is a lower cost of production and distribution, plus for me, the added bonus of instant two way communication. Can you hear me now? I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;d have the impact on paper with a two or three month gap in between parts. </p>
<p>In my mind I don&#8217;t feel that building a LEGO MOC is any different than building any sort of art, and there are plenty of books full of rules and presentation techiques to make things more pleasing or to create the opposite effect. Mosaics are drawings or paintings and vigs are dioramas or statues. People who aren&#8217;t into LEGO understand the correlation. Just saying &#8220;I like to build statues and not have to paint them&#8221; breaks down all sorts of barriers in communication. But even with all that knowledge behind me, I try to break some conventions when I can. It&#8217;s not always successful but shape and color have nearly endless combinations, why not try as many as you can. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see anything wrong with raising the bar for the hobby, as well as tossin&#8217; in a little fun discussion. It&#8217;s all great. More building tips can only be a big help to the person starting out, like me. I know I suck at robot building and I&#8217;m an infant when it comes to Technics. I used to throw them in a box and hide that box. Now I have to go on Bricklink to look up some of those parts to even understand what they are. Oh, it does that. Well, I&#8217;m using it for a downspout. </p>
<p>Ted brings up a good point about not trying to convince people that their hobby is worth while. Either people can see the value of the message or they can&#8217;t. Time solves many problems. Model Railroading has been around for at least a century, (I&#8217;m guessin&#8217; here but don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m too far off) and people know about it because it&#8217;s been around so long. It&#8217;s become part of the public conciousness, and people know it&#8217;s not too dangerous. Just the expensiveness of it creates a sort of respectability. I alway tell people that LEGO is really expensive. </p>
<p>I joined Science Fiction fandom in 1970 when it was a spurned reading matter. &#8220;You read science fiction? Ohhh.&#8221; Yeah, at least three h&#8217;s. But, since Star Trek and Star Wars everybody and his brother is a science fiction fan. LEGO is a toddler on that scale, especially if you are just looking at the AFOL community. Have people had weird or negative experiences when they reveal their secret identity. Mostly I have had really great reactions from people when I tell them my hobby is building with LEGO. Especially when I show them something. Actually, I bring things to work and force people to look at them. &#8220;I am not goin&#8217; away.&#8221; Since I mostly make MOC&#8217;s with a bit of a fun message I think they get recieved fairly well. And that really gets back to the message and how readable that message is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zepher</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2008/06/09/lego-is-communication-summing-up/comment-page-1/#comment-40265</link>
		<dc:creator>Zepher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 23:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=2399#comment-40265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d really like some tips on building, and, for one thing, getting people to notice my work.  It&#039;s annoying to get my stuff up and never have anyone view/comment on it.  I&#039;d also be interested in tips from good builders (ex:  Mark Kelso, Keith Goldman, Nannan)  Sorta like a Question and Answer thing!  To sum up, things I&#039;d like to see in the future:
1)  How to get your moc&#039;s noticed.
2)  General Building Tips (maybe each &quot;Brother&quot; could do one)
3)  Questions and Answers with good builders about peticular builds and builds in general!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d really like some tips on building, and, for one thing, getting people to notice my work.  It&#8217;s annoying to get my stuff up and never have anyone view/comment on it.  I&#8217;d also be interested in tips from good builders (ex:  Mark Kelso, Keith Goldman, Nannan)  Sorta like a Question and Answer thing!  To sum up, things I&#8217;d like to see in the future:<br />
1)  How to get your moc&#8217;s noticed.<br />
2)  General Building Tips (maybe each &#8220;Brother&#8221; could do one)<br />
3)  Questions and Answers with good builders about peticular builds and builds in general!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2008/06/09/lego-is-communication-summing-up/comment-page-1/#comment-40258</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=2399#comment-40258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d have to say I really enjoyed the series but I would really like to see more of this in BrickJournal. I want to see the longer-form serious articles but would rather read them in print where they are targeted at a LEGO-specific audience. Education of non-builders is all well and good but taking our hobby (but not ourselves) more seriously would produce more long-term results.

Model railroaders don&#039;t try to convince people their hobby is worthwhile. We shouldn&#039;t have to either, but to get there it starts with US, not THEM.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to say I really enjoyed the series but I would really like to see more of this in BrickJournal. I want to see the longer-form serious articles but would rather read them in print where they are targeted at a LEGO-specific audience. Education of non-builders is all well and good but taking our hobby (but not ourselves) more seriously would produce more long-term results.</p>
<p>Model railroaders don&#8217;t try to convince people their hobby is worthwhile. We shouldn&#8217;t have to either, but to get there it starts with US, not THEM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2008/06/09/lego-is-communication-summing-up/comment-page-1/#comment-40257</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=2399#comment-40257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Paul.  Most importantly the message about proper presentation techniques.  All too often I notice a wonderful MOC pictured out of focus on Mom&#039;s antique table with the cigarette still burning in the ash trash next to it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Paul.  Most importantly the message about proper presentation techniques.  All too often I notice a wonderful MOC pictured out of focus on Mom&#8217;s antique table with the cigarette still burning in the ash trash next to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh Holcombe</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2008/06/09/lego-is-communication-summing-up/comment-page-1/#comment-40256</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh Holcombe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=2399#comment-40256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve really enjoyed this series of articles, and I would prefer to see them continued.  Perhaps once a week or so, you could do a critical review?  Pick an MOC being featured on the blog, and talk about it.  Point out how it communicates effectively (or not), how its techniques impose a certain reception, that sort of thing.

I also think that this series can be extended with discussion of design principles as the toolbox of communication.  Contrast, white space, busyness, foreground/background, shape, and even the golden ratio can really effect how a model is perceived.  Plus, little lessons in design topics would help all builders.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve really enjoyed this series of articles, and I would prefer to see them continued.  Perhaps once a week or so, you could do a critical review?  Pick an MOC being featured on the blog, and talk about it.  Point out how it communicates effectively (or not), how its techniques impose a certain reception, that sort of thing.</p>
<p>I also think that this series can be extended with discussion of design principles as the toolbox of communication.  Contrast, white space, busyness, foreground/background, shape, and even the golden ratio can really effect how a model is perceived.  Plus, little lessons in design topics would help all builders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2008/06/09/lego-is-communication-summing-up/comment-page-1/#comment-40255</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 20:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=2399#comment-40255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enjoyed this series and I do think writing like this belongs on the blog.  While I appreciate all the news and featured Mocs, I like the idea of having someplace to carry on a discourse about Legos, and perhaps taking Moc building to a new level.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed this series and I do think writing like this belongs on the blog.  While I appreciate all the news and featured Mocs, I like the idea of having someplace to carry on a discourse about Legos, and perhaps taking Moc building to a new level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lego is communication &#124; The Brothers Brick &#124; LEGO Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.brothers-brick.com/2008/06/09/lego-is-communication-summing-up/comment-page-1/#comment-40250</link>
		<dc:creator>Lego is communication &#124; The Brothers Brick &#124; LEGO Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothers-brick.com/?p=2399#comment-40250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] build, with case study #1 3b. Case study #2 3c. Case study #3 4. Tools: Presentation 5. Other 6. Summing up     Bohman posted this entry on Sunday, May 4th, 2008 at 6:12 am. Posted in the category Essays, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] build, with case study #1 3b. Case study #2 3c. Case study #3 4. Tools: Presentation 5. Other 6. Summing up     Bohman posted this entry on Sunday, May 4th, 2008 at 6:12 am. Posted in the category Essays, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
